What Adam Is Reading
Everyone Who Stayed Lost Weight
A UK telehealth company put 8,127 women on tirzepatide through an app, and Nature Medicine published the results. The drug works. The paper is better evidence for that than for the business model it was built to showcase.
Single source review · Nature Medicine, published 16 October 2026 · 9 sources · October 2026

Limits of this analysis. I read the full paper, including the methods, extended data tables and figures, and disclosures. I did not read the Supplementary Methods (which hold the side effect package, data cleaning rules and eligibility details) or the peer review reports, and I did not rerun the authors' public code. Trial comparisons use published SURMOUNT results, which differ from this cohort in timepoint and design. The critique was checked against primary sources and run past two other models (GPT‑5.2 and Grok 4.6) with authorship stripped. The paper is one day old, so there is no published commentary yet.

Claude drafted this review.

Between late November 2024 and the end of January 2025, about sixteen thousand women in the UK signed up on a website for a weight loss injection. They answered questionnaires, stood on their own bathroom scales while a proctor watched over video, and mailed a finger prick blood sample to a lab. Those who made it through got tirzepatide (Mounjaro) delivered to the door, a monthly check in with a clinician, and an app that asked for their weight every week.

The company was SheMed, a women only GLP-1 brand founded in 2024, and the prescribing was done under eMed Healthcare UK, the subsidiary US digital health company eMed set up in 2023 to buy Babylon Health's UK business out of administration. John Deanfield, a senior UCL preventive cardiologist, led the analysis with UCL statisticians and Donna Ryan of Pennington, a veteran of obesity drug trials.

Six months later the average woman who stayed on treatment had lost 16.1 kg (about 35 lb), or 15.5% of her starting weight. Her HbA1c and cholesterol fell too. The authors conclude that a structured digital program can deliver obesity pharmacotherapy safely and at scale.

Who made it into the denominator
16,121
Finished online onboarding and were sent a home blood test kit.
−4,025
Never completed the blood test. One in four applicants, gone before the first dose and never described beyond age, BMI and postcode.
−308
Excluded by clinicians for abnormal labs or contraindications.
−3,661
Prescribed after the 9 February 2025 administrative cutoff. A calendar exclusion, not a clinical one.
8,127
The analytic cohort. Mean age 45, mean weight 104 kg, mean BMI 38. Eighty eight percent white. Only 2.5% had a diabetes range HbA1c.
7,297
Had a six month weight. These are the women behind the headline number.

The claims
1
Mean weight loss of 15.5% at six months, at below maximal doses
What the evidence shows

The number is consistent with what tirzepatide does in trials, and with women tending to lose more than men on these drugs. Mean dose at six months was 9.5 mg, below the 15 mg ceiling, because clinicians held escalation for anyone already losing about 2 kg a month. That is a sensible prescribing habit and probably a cost saving. The trajectory figures are clean, and inverse probability weighting for missing data barely moved the estimates (16.06 kg versus 16.03 kg).

What to hold loosely

This is a completer number. Women who stopped before six months averaged 5.4% loss at their last weigh in, versus 15.6% for those who stayed. A crude blend of the two groups lands near 14.7%, so the dropouts do not sink the result. The 4,025 who never finished onboarding are a different matter. They are outside every denominator. Weights came from participants' own scales, proctored over video, and nobody was randomized to anything. In SURMOUNT‑1 the placebo arm lost 3.1% over 72 weeks on diet and counseling alone, and paying customers who sign up for weekly supervised weigh ins are not a placebo arm.

Mostly Solid
2
Consistent response across age, weight and socioeconomic strata
What the evidence shows

Deprivation quintile made no difference to weight loss (P = 0.364), which is the paper's best equity finding. Response was broadly similar across starting weight bands in percentage terms. The 99.3% of women who lost some weight looks almost too good, but it is a completer figure and a small loss counts.

What the abstract leaves out

Ethnicity. Nonwhite women lost 13.5% against 15.8% for white women, and were more likely to stop treatment (hazard ratio 1.27). The abstract lists the strata where results were consistent and drops the one where they were not. Age differences were also statistically significant (16.1% in the youngest group, 14.8% in the oldest). And deprivation here is measured by postcode. A woman paying out of pocket for a GLP-1 program while living in the most deprived fifth of postcodes is not a typical resident of that postcode.

Embellished
3
Broad metabolic improvement, with HbA1c normalizing in 84.5% of those in the diabetes range
What the evidence shows

Mean HbA1c fell from 36.3 to 33.0 mmol/mol (about 5.5% to 5.2%) in a population that was mostly normoglycemic to begin with. Total cholesterol fell 0.77 mmol/L (about 30 mg/dL), LDL 0.61 (about 24 mg/dL), triglycerides 0.47 (about 42 mg/dL). Very few women started new statins or diabetes drugs, so the changes are not a medication artifact. The direction matches everything known about tirzepatide.

What to hold loosely

The 84.5% figure covers 155 women classified as diabetic on one capillary HbA1c. Selecting people on a single high value guarantees some fall back on retest, and a drop from 48 to 47 mmol/mol counts as normalization. The lipid changes are also bigger than the randomized evidence. In SURMOUNT‑3 (an imperfect comparator, since everyone first completed 12 weeks of intensive lifestyle therapy), at 72 weeks tirzepatide lowered LDL 6.1% and total cholesterol 3.0%, and HDL rose 15.4%. Here LDL fell about 16%, total cholesterol about 13%, and HDL fell about 14%. The authors attribute the HDL drop to the active weight loss phase, which is plausible. Six months versus 72 weeks explains part of the gap. Home finger prick sampling, uncertain fasting status and the absence of a placebo arm (where LDL rose 6.1% in SURMOUNT‑3) may explain more.

Mostly Solid
4
91.4% retention and no serious treatment related adverse events
What the evidence shows

Retention is high by any real world standard, where GLP-1 discontinuation within a year often runs past a third. Side effects were common (62.7% reported at least one) and mostly gastrointestinal and mild or moderate. Women who used the company's symptom package of over the counter medicines and diet advice stopped treatment less often (5.0% versus 7.4%).

What to hold loosely

Discontinuation was defined as no dispensing for more than eight weeks after the last one. Unless follow up ran past six months, which the paper does not state, a woman whose last pen shipped after about week 18 could not yet count as a dropout by week 26. Safety was self reported through the app with no linkage to NHS hospital records, so a gallbladder admission at a district general hospital would surface only if the patient mentioned it. Package users chose to use the package, which makes the 5.0% versus 7.4% comparison a statement about who uses packages. Retention also means a pen was shipped, not that it was injected. Eleven women became pregnant during follow up and stopped treatment. Tirzepatide's label warns that it can reduce oral contraceptive absorption, and the main paper does not describe contraception counseling or screening for eating disorders, two standing concerns with online weight loss prescribing to women.

Mostly Solid
5
A digital model that fills an evidence gap for women and can replicate specialist care at scale
What the paper actually shows

A remote program with identity checks, proctored weigh ins, home labs and monthly clinician review can initiate and titrate tirzepatide in thousands of women with low rates of serious trouble, at least as far as self report can see. That is real implementation evidence, and the at home lab and proctoring infrastructure is more than most direct to consumer platforms bother with.

What the framing inflates

The evidence gap the authors cite is in cardiovascular outcomes trials such as SELECT, where most participants were men. This study has no outcomes, only six months of surrogates. The weight loss trials were already mostly women (67.5% in SURMOUNT‑1). Replicating specialist care cannot be shown without a comparison to specialist care. Scalability is untested on price. The program was partly subsidized by the provider during the study, the authors call that pricing possibly unsustainable, and every participant started before Lilly raised the UK list price of Mounjaro by up to 170% on 1 September 2025.

Embellished

The authors and the money

SheMed and eMed Healthcare UK cooperated the program. Two of the nine authors are their employees and handled data curation and project administration. Deanfield, the corresponding author, who led conceptualization and funding acquisition, discloses consulting fees from eMed. Ryan discloses consulting for eMed and for a long list of obesity drug makers, plus stock options in Calibrate, a US digital GLP-1 company. Emma Deanfield, listed as an independent researcher in London, shares conceptualization and methodology credit with the corresponding author. The paper does not state whether they are related.

The study was funded by a grant from The Chicago Community Trust through a donor advised fund, which does not name the donor. The analysis was done by UCL statisticians on pseudonymized data, and the code is public on GitHub and Zenodo. The data are not. Requests go to a SheMed support address. Under UK Health Research Authority rules the project counted as service evaluation and needed no research ethics committee review. SheMed announced a $50 million raise in October 2025, which its press release billed as unicorn status.

None of this is hidden, and industry involvement does not make the numbers wrong. It does explain why the paper reads as an implementation brochure for one company's model more than as a test of it.

So What

Tirzepatide works when delivered through a phone, in women who can pay, finish the paperwork and keep answering the weekly prompt. That is worth knowing as GLP-1 prescribing moves out of clinics. The paper cannot say whether the app adds anything to the drug, whether it holds at full price, or what happened to the quarter of applicants who never made it to the first injection.

Confidence: high that tirzepatide produced substantial weight loss in completers. Moderate for the size of the lipid and HbA1c changes and for retention. Low for claims about equity by ethnicity, safety beyond self report, and the value of the digital model over conventional prescribing.

Sources

Primary: Deanfield J, Wong JLC, Katsoulis M, et al. Real world, digital first delivery of GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy in women. Nature Medicine, published online 16 October 2026. doi.org/10.1038/s41591-026-04687-x

Analysis code: Wong JLC. Zenodo 2026. doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18821943

SURMOUNT‑1: Jastreboff AM, et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N Engl J Med 2022;387:205–216. Summary via acc.org

SURMOUNT‑3 lipids: Wadden TA, et al. Tirzepatide after intensive lifestyle intervention in adults with overweight or obesity. Nat Med 2023. pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

SURMOUNT‑1 cardiometabolic post hoc: Hankosky ER, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab 2024;26:319–328. doi.org/10.1111/dom.15318

Mounjaro UK price: The Pharmaceutical Journal, UK's biggest online pharmacy freezes Mounjaro price amid reports of stockpiling (August 2025). pharmaceutical-journal.com

eMed and Babylon: pharmaphorum, Two Babylon Health divisions have been sold to eMed (September 2023). pharmaphorum.com

SheMed funding: MobiHealthNews, SheMed raises $50M to expand women's GLP-1 weight management platform (October 2025). mobihealthnews.com; PR Newswire release prnewswire.com